Friday, July 11, 2008
KASHMIR KI KALI OF 1964,SUBHASH KANU PRIYA MUKHOPADHAYA AND BRITISH COMMON WEALTH THIEVES PLO -1964 IN JERUSALEM
Kashmir Ki Kali
(1964)
Kashmir Ki Kali (1964)
Kashmir Ki Kali (1964)
Plot summary for
Kashmir Ki Kali (1964)
Rajiv has come of age; his now-dead father had built up a flourishing business and had become a millionaire, and his widowed Mother wants to keep Rajiv on the straight and narrow. The best way would be to find him a good wife to encourage him to settle down. But Rajiv is having none of it, and runs off to the family's summer house in Srinagar to enjoy life. But en route he has to stay overnight at a country inn because of a bridge collapse. Mr Mohan is staying there for the same reason, with a group of girls her was taking to the fair in Srinagar. Rajiv has to sleep under the stairs, and during the night Champa spills some water on him; they talk, but she keeps her distance. The next day they meet again by chance, and when she sees he is driving a big car, she is cool with him; when she thought he was poor, he was attractive, but now that she thinks he is rich, she is put off. He tells her that he is the driver for a rich man, and she talks to him some more. At Srinagar, he finds that his valet has hired out his house for the season to some girls, and he has to find accommodation in the town. The romance between Champa and Rajiv develops, to the chagrin of the nasty Mohan, who himself has designs on her. Champa?s father Dinu is persuaded to forbid Champa to go to the fair with Rajiv, as she had planned. But Rajiv is not so easily thwarted, and dressed as a female in purdah, he gets a lift on the truck that is taking the girls. A song and dance number on the back of the moving truck then takes place. Mohan persists in alarming Dinu, who is blind, about Champa's intentions, and it emerges that Dinu is not the natural father of Champa, but that he kidnapped her as a baby from a rich Delhi merchant. The name of the merchant was ... well, walls have ears and that must remain a secret for now. Who can the merchant have been? Written by Hazel Freeman-MEHBOOBA MUFTI
Wealthy and pampered Rajivlal is the only son of widowed Rani Maa. She would like him to get married and starts receiving proposals from all over the country. She meets with and interviews various prospective brides, and picks one for him, only to have him reject her. To escape her wrath, he runs off to their bungalow in Kashmir together with his friend, Chander. Upon arrival, he finds that his Estate Manager, Bholaram, has made a Hotel out of their bungalow and has even rented out some rooms for the season. He confronts the Manager, and both compromise. He meets Champa, who sells flowers for a living, and both in love. They plan to marry, but surprisingly Champa's dad, Dinu, is opposed to this marriage. To complicate matters even more, Rajivlal finds out that he is not the son of Rani Maa, and he goes about to find his real identity. It is now up to Rani Maa to find out why Dinu is refusing to permit Champa to marry Rajivlal, and who his real parents are?
YouTube - O.P. Bhatt,
www.youtube.com/watch?v=AHZz0jqyT40
26- TO -62
6-2-1991
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elizabeth_II_of_the_United_Kingdom
Elizabeth II (Elizabeth Alexandra Mary;[1] born 21 April 1926) is the Queen regnant of 16 independent states and their overseas territories and dependencies. Though she holds each crown and title separately and equally, she is resident in and most directly involved with the United Kingdom, her oldest realm. She can trace her lineage through the royal houses of England and Wessex for over fifteen hundred years, and can also claim descent from the House of Stuart in Scotland. She ascended the thrones of seven countries in February 1952 on the death of her father King George VI. (See Context below.)
In addition to the United Kingdom, Elizabeth II is also Queen of Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Jamaica, Barbados, the Bahamas, Grenada, Papua New Guinea, the Solomon Islands, Tuvalu, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Belize, Antigua and Barbuda, and Saint Kitts and Nevis, in each of which she is represented by a Governor-General. The 16 countries of which she is Queen are known as Commonwealth realms, and their combined population, including dependencies, is over 129 million. In theory her powers are vast; in practice (and in accordance with convention) she herself rarely intervenes in political matters. In the United Kingdom at least, however, she is known to take an active behind-the-scenes interest in the affairs of state, meeting regularly to establish a working relationship with her government ministers.
Baby eliza- bet Lauren{WEARING HER HEART ON HER SLEEVE}
October 1, 2003 – January 30, 2004
Star-of-Bethlehem
Elizabeth II holds a variety of other positions, among them Head of the Commonwealth, Supreme Governor of the Church of England, Duke of Normandy, Lord of Mann, and Paramount Chief of Fiji. Her long reign has seen sweeping changes in her realms and the world at large, perhaps most notably the dissolution of the British Empire (a process that began in the last years of her father's reign) and the consequent evolution of the modern Commonwealth of Nations.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samuel_Bourne
Samuel Bourne (1834–24 April 1912) was a British photographer known for his work in India.The studio business prospered, and in 1866, they opened a second branch in Calcutta. In 1867 he went briefly back to England, in order to marry Mary Tolley, daughter of a wealthy Nottingham businessman; and they both returned to India again later that year, where he continued to travel around the country, producing some 500 more fine images, before departing from Bombay to return permanently to England, in November 1870. His work as travelling landscape and architectural photographer for Bourne & Shepherd studios was taken over by Colin Murray, who continued taking fine images of India, in a very similar style, and later went on to take over the management of the business.
Bourne settled back in Nottingham, where he founded a cotton-doubling business, in partnership with his brother-in-law J.B. Tolley. Some time shortly after his return to England, he sold off his interests in Bourne and Shepherd studios, and from then on, had nothing more to do with commercial photography; however his archive of some 2,200 glass plate negatives remained with the studio, and were constantly re-printed and sold, over the following 140 years, until their eventual destruction, in a fire at Bourne & Shepherd’s present studio in Calcutta,
on February 6th 1991.
|
|  |
He became a very successful and prosperous Nottingham businessman; founding the Britannia Cotton Mills, and becoming a local magistrate. Although continuing to photograph as a relaxation, and belonging to the local Photographic Society, much of his creative energy from this time onwards was devoted to water-colour painting. He died in Nottingham on 24th April 1912.
Bourne is justly regarded as one of the finest landscape and travel photographers of 19th century India; combining a fine eye for composition with high technical expertise. He wrote extensively about his travels in the Himalayas (one of the very few photographers in India to do so), in a long series of letters, which appeared in The British Journal of Photography, between 1863 and 1870.
Saturday, April 12, 2008
22 YEAR OLD MANU SHARMA IS 1977 BORN AND IMPLICATED TO UNSEAT HIS FATHER VINOD SHARMA INC
The London Stock Exchange is in the heart of the City of
Address:
Telephone: +44 (0) 20 7797 1000
Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs)
1972
Her Majesty the Queen opens the Exchange's new 26-storey office block with its 23,000sq ft trading floor.
O.P. Bhatt appointed SBI Chairman
Our Bureau
MR O.P. BHATT
Mumbai , June 30
Mr O.P. Bhatt, Managing Director, State Bank of India, has been appointed Chairman of the bank. The five-year term of Mr Bhatt will expire in March 2011. His will be the longest tenure as SBI chairman in the recent past.
Mr Bhatt took charge as the Managing Director, in-charge of national banking at SBI in April. Prior to this he was the MD, State Bank of Travancore.
Mr T.S. Bhattacharya, the other SBI MD, was appointed as acting chairman, following the retirement of Mr A.K. Purwar as chairman in May. However, Mr Bhattacharya did not have a two-year residual service, necessary for the post of chairman.
The announcement of Mr Bhatt's appointment came on Friday at the SBI annual general meeting in Mumbai.
It was during his tenure as MD of SBT that the bank had implemented core-banking solution in all its branches.
Starting his career as a probationary officer in SBI in 1972, Mr Bhatt held several key assignments in the bank. He served as Managing Director of State Bank of Travancore from January 2005 to April 2006.
HIGH COURT OF
NOTICE
63 JAYA KUMARI KEDIA JAGDISH PRASAD KEDIA 140630113
64 JOGENDER SINGH RAMPARSAD 180630789
65 KAILASH KUMAR BUDH SINGH 120630320 SC
66 KAMALAPATI KASHYAP UMAPATI CHOUDHARY 110630317
67 KAPIL BANATI JITENDER NATH BANATI 110630369
68 KARUNA SHARMA A K SHARMA 110630152
69 KHUSHTER DANISH MOHD GHALIB RASOOL 130630723
70
71 KUMAR KARTIKEYA S N TEWARY 200630006
72 LATIKA RANA Y P
73 MADHU BHATTI D S BHATTI 130630492
74 MANDEEP MITTAL KULDIP SINGH MITTAL 170630521
75 MANISH CHAUHAN RAMBIR SINGH 110630355
76 MANISH KHURANA JAGMOHAN LAL KHURANA 130630752
77 MOHD MUQEEM MOHD SALEEM 180630298
| 959 | 249381 | 125000745 | KUNDAN LAL | | SC | 128.75 |
| 960 | 247766 | 125000329 | KUNWAR BHANU PRATAP | JEETENDAR SINGH | OTHERS | 125.25 |
| 961 | 249457 | 120000617 | KUNWAR NAGENDRA | KANHAIYA LAL | SC | 113.00 |
| 962 | 248310 | 130000320 | KUSUM LATA | | OTHERS | 93.75 |
| 963 | 247416 | 125000426 | KUSUM YADAV | KRISHAN KUMAR YADAV | OTHERS | 104.50 |
| 964 | 249844 | 128000430 | LAKHVIR SINGH | | OTHERS | 85.00 |
| 965 | 247544 | 128000651 | LAKSHITA SETHI | NISHI KANT SETHI | OTHERS | 112.50 |
| 966 | 248045 | 130000085 | LAKSHMAN KUMAR VERMA | CHANDRIKA VERMA | OTHERS | 109.50 |
| 967 | 249106 | 130000452 | LAL CHAND | CHANDER PAL SINGH | SC | 79.75 |
| 968 | 146330 | 128000656 | LALIT KUMAR | JAWAHAR SINGH | OTHERS | 131.75 |
| 969 | 246407 | 128000329 | LALIT SHARMA | K | OTHERS | 136.00 |
| 970 | 247309 | 128000461 | LALIT YADAV | MAHINDER SINGH YADAV | OTHERS | 99.75 |
| 971 | 247538 | 130000661 | LALITA RANI | DEA RAJ BANSAL | OTHERS | 115.50 |
| 972 | 246052 | 130000268 | LATIKA RANA | Y P | OTHERS | 133.75 |
| 973 | 246438 | 125000487 | LATIKA RAO | AJAY SINGH YADAV | OTHERS | 90.00 |
| 974 | 248443 | 120000296 | LOKESH BHOLA | SH D L BHOLA | OTHERS | 142.25 |
| 975 | 246944 | 120000109 | LOKESH GUPTA | KAILASH CHAND GUPTA | OTHERS | 151.25 |
| 976 | 246268 | 125000022 | LOKESH KUMAR DAHIYA | SUKHBIR SINGH DAHIYA | OTHERS | 94.50 |
http://web.archive.org/web/20050301-20050530re_
http://www.londonstockexchange.com/en-gb/about/cooverview/history.htm
http://www.londonstockexchange.com/en-gb/about/cooverview/thesource
/sourcenewsarchive/161007statebankofindia.htm
The Source
|
The Exchange welcomes the State Bank of India
The London Stock Exchange is delighted to welcome Mr.O.P.Bhatt, Chairman of the State Bank of India (SBI) to mark the occasion of the 11th anniversary of the listing of State Bank of India in London. SBI GDRs are currently listed on the Professional Securities Market.
State Bank of India is India’s largest commercial bank in terms of profits, assets, deposits, branches and employees. The bank recently became the first public sector bank to reach a market capitalisation of Rs.1 trillion (USD25 billion) and is one of 10 companies on the Indian bourses with market capitalisation over this figure. SBI is one of the most actively traded shares in India.
SBI is the only Indian bank ranked in the 100 top global banks by the Banker and also the only Indian bank featuring in the Global Fortune 500 companies. SBI is a pre-eminent financial institution in India and has a presence in diverse segments of the Indian financial sector. The SBI Group operates its various businesses through its associates and key subsidiaries.
International banking services of State Bank of India are delivered through a network of 85 offices/branches in 32 countries, spread over all time zones.
Govt to get RBI’s stake in SBI today
New Delhi, June 28
|  |
http://www.aicc.org.in/rajiv-g-gallery.php
Janbaaz (1986)
SEE THE FEAR IN THE EYES OF MY SISTER'S DAUGHTER- DAMINI AND THE GLOBE AND EGG RATTLES ; IN SLEEPING ANEESH'S HANDS WHICH I HAD PUT TO TAKE THE PHOTOGRAPH TO EXEMPLIFY DAYANAND'S STATEMENT OF LORD SHIVA NOT SAVING HIS DEVOTEES OR THE WORLD OR A MOTHER OR A WIFE -
-WHOSE CHILDREN ARE THESE?
THE PRODUCT OF EGGS AND SURROGACY-TO BETRAY THEIR PARENTS IN OLD AGE ?
-TO KILL THEM?
THEN WHEN I KNEW ABOUT THIS FILTH -WHY SHOULD I HAVE ALLOWED A CLONED DAYANAND TO SURVIVE AND EDUCATE AND FEED HIM WITH MY MONEY?FOR WHAT? SO THAT A GROWN UP ANEESH AT THE AGE OF 18 WOULD CLAIM A BEDROOM ROTTER TO BE HIS EGG DNA MOTHER AND KILL ME OR GET ME CLASSIFIED AS MAD ?
THESE ARE THE TRAITORS AND THIEVES WHO MAKE THE BLUE COLOR OF MY SHIVA AS A LIE BY MIXING IT WITH WHITE AND USING IT AS A BACKGROUND FOR FILTHY WOMEN READY TO OCCUPY THE HOUSE AND BEDS WHICH ARE NOT THEIRS BY TREACHERY AND BIGOTRY -THESE WOMEN ARE WIVES?THEY ARE MOTHERS- WHOSE EGGS WERE EXTRACTED FROM THE FORE SKIN OF THEIR VAGINAS WHEN THEY WERE 13?
THAT IS WHY I HAVE PUT A WHITISH -PINK GLOBE RATTLE IN ANEESH'S HANDS-WHERE WAS HIS EGG MOTHER WHEN HE WAS SO HELPLESS THAT I COULD HAVE SNUFFED OUT HIS LIFE WITH THE SAME WHITISH BLUE PILLOW BENEATH HIS HEAD ,WHICH IS THE TRADEMARK OF HIS FILTHY GUTTER FATHER'S CUNT CULT?
STATE BANK IS A PUBLIC SECTOR BANK RESPONSIBLE TOWARDS ITS EMPLOYEES AND THE FINANCIAL HEALTH OF THE COUNTRY .
IT IS NOT THE BAAP KA MAAL OF LONDON AND HAS BRANCHES ALL OVER THE WORLD SUBJECT TO KUT NITI OF THE FOREIGN/EXTERNAL AFFAIRS MINISTRY OF INDIA -ANSWERABLE TO THE WORLD.
PLEASE DECLARE THE LARGE AMOUNTS BEING GIVEN TO BIG COMPANIES AND THEIR RATE OF RETURN TO THE BANK BEFORE ANNOUNCING THE MERGER ;IN YOUR ANNUAL REPORT.
HONORABLE; EDUCATED AND VIRTUOUS
WOMEN ARE NOT CAMELS TO BE KILLED FOR THEIR BODIES.
THEY ARE SUPPOSED TO BE SOMEONE'S
BLOOD DAUGHTER AND HAVE BRAINS -YOU CUNT LICKING BASTARDS.
www.bollywoodblog.com/
Fardeen KhanBombay: 29 Mar 2005/Sawf News Service/ --
Come 2006, and style-icon actor
Fardeen Khan is scheduled to marry Natasha Madhwani,
daughter of yesteryear-sexy actress
Mumtaz (heroine of many hits with her
co-star Rajesh Khanna)
and
www.surfindia.com/.../
Personal Profile (Personal Biography)
Date of Birth (Birthday):
Fardeen Khan to face trial for drug possession
Trouble is once again brewing for Bollywood actor Fardeen Khan for he will have to face trial for possession of banned substance after the Bombay High Court rejected his application on Thursday for undergoing detoxification.
Khan, who was arrested in May 2001 by Narcotics Control Bureau in suburban Juhu when he was allegedly about to buy one gram of cocaine from a drug peddler, had approached the HC for detoxification after sessions court rejected his application in September 2006
Khan had sought immunity from facing trial by admitting that he was purchasing cocaine for personal consumption as he was an addict and was willing to undergo medical treatment in any government institution.
Justice SC
The court has however granted liberty to Khan to reapply in the session's court with proper material to show that he is an addict and that the cocaine was for self consumption.
Khan had approached the HC to undergo detoxification as allowed under section 64(A) of the Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act which permits immunity from prosecution. The NDPS Act permits an accused to apply for detoxification under section 64(A) if he is found in possession of small quantity of drugs for personal consumption. If the court is satisfied that he has successfully undergone detoxification, the prosecution may withdraw charges.
The section states that an "addict" can claim immunity from prosecution if he voluntarily agrees to undergo complete medical treatment. If he comes out clean than he does not have to face trial, Public prosecutor Poornima Kantharia had argued while opposing Khan's plea.
Under the Act, the accused has to prove that he is an addict to claim immunity, which the actor failed to do.
Khan had failed to prove through any documentary evidence that he had undergone any medical treatment earlier following which he has come over his addiction.
Khan had admitted that he had purchased one gram of cocaine on four to five occasions to overcome work stress. "That would not make him an addict and show that he is dependent on drugs. Merely on his statement it cannot be concluded that it was for personal consumption," said Kantharia.
Khan was arrested in May 2001 by Narcotics Control Bureau in suburban Juhu when he was allegedly about to buy one gram of cocaine from a drug peddler. He was released on bail later.
The NCB had seized nine grams of cocaine from the peddler Nasir Khan who told police that the actor wanted to buy just one gram of cocaine for personal consumption. However, the chargesheet against him has said Khan was in possession of nine grams and not one gram of cocaine.
Sunday, June 1, 2008
TERROR FUNDING BUILDER MAFIA OF OSAMA AND ELIZABETH ENGLAND 1937 ARYA SAMAJ/ARTICLE 370 OF KASHMIR AND INA TRIAL SECTION 109
From: mamta kalra
Subject: GROSS MISCARRIAGE OF THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM AND WORKERS
Subject: GROSS MISCARRIAGE OF THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM AND WORKERS
RIGHTS IN THE PRIYAMVADA BIRLA WILL CASE BY THE SUPREME COURT
To: mills@digjam.co.in, vxldigjam@sify.com, bvxlcorp@birla-vxl.com, bvora@bvxl.com, ucvxl@birla-vxl.com, export@birla-vxl.com
Cc: jawahar_kaul@rediffmail.com, Jawahar_kaul@yahoo.co.in, sarabjit.taneja@rediffmail.com, pushpakumarl@gmail.com, meenapanicker@rediffmail.com, k_ratnabali@rediffmail.com, shobha_ssaxena@rediffmail.com, jasmine_sharma@rediffmail.com, anjuvalitikoo@yahoo.co.in, dr_rv@hotmail.com, rajni_abbi@yahoo.co.in, vkahuja2002@yahoo.co.in, achawla@lawyer.com, pd_70_70@yahoo.com, gitanjali1@indiatimes.com, btkaul@yahoo.com, incharge@yahoo.com, rajivkhannas@rediffmail.com, gireeshlegus@yahoo.com, mittalraman@gmail.com, scraina@indiatimes.com, razdanusha@yahoo.co.in, kamala_sankaran@hotmail.com, poonamsaxena@hotmail.com, pinki_sharma2004@yahoo.co.in, gurdipsinghbahri@yahoo.com, lawcentre2@yahoo.com, utandon82@yahoo.com, av_geet@yahoo.co.in, nomitais@hotmail.com, anu.law@rediffmail.com, akb@cliptrade.com, sunanda.bharti@gmail.com, profharishchander@hotmail.com, choudhary_aditi@rediffmail.com, vageshwari@rediffmail.com, dr_suman_gupta@yahoo.co.in, jhaanupam@yahoo.co.in, in_sk_verma@yahoo.com, paulkk@nic.in, jcpcawvimla@hotmail.com, maxpk@vsnl.com, r_narayan@nic.in, satishchandraphq@sify.com, kanwaljit@nic.in, dcp_eastdelhi@yahoo.co.in, dcp_ne@yahoo.com
Date: Saturday, July 5, 2008, 9:56 PM wrote:
TO,
THE EDITOR
MAIL TODAY
To: mills@digjam.co.in, vxldigjam@sify.com, bvxlcorp@birla-vxl.com, bvora@bvxl.com, ucvxl@birla-vxl.com, export@birla-vxl.com
Cc: jawahar_kaul@rediffmail.com, Jawahar_kaul@yahoo.co.in, sarabjit.taneja@rediffmail.com, pushpakumarl@gmail.com, meenapanicker@rediffmail.com, k_ratnabali@rediffmail.com, shobha_ssaxena@rediffmail.com, jasmine_sharma@rediffmail.com, anjuvalitikoo@yahoo.co.in, dr_rv@hotmail.com, rajni_abbi@yahoo.co.in, vkahuja2002@yahoo.co.in, achawla@lawyer.com, pd_70_70@yahoo.com, gitanjali1@indiatimes.com, btkaul@yahoo.com, incharge@yahoo.com, rajivkhannas@rediffmail.com, gireeshlegus@yahoo.com, mittalraman@gmail.com, scraina@indiatimes.com, razdanusha@yahoo.co.in, kamala_sankaran@hotmail.com, poonamsaxena@hotmail.com, pinki_sharma2004@yahoo.co.in, gurdipsinghbahri@yahoo.com, lawcentre2@yahoo.com, utandon82@yahoo.com, av_geet@yahoo.co.in, nomitais@hotmail.com, anu.law@rediffmail.com, akb@cliptrade.com, sunanda.bharti@gmail.com, profharishchander@hotmail.com, choudhary_aditi@rediffmail.com, vageshwari@rediffmail.com, dr_suman_gupta@yahoo.co.in, jhaanupam@yahoo.co.in, in_sk_verma@yahoo.com, paulkk@nic.in, jcpcawvimla@hotmail.com, maxpk@vsnl.com, r_narayan@nic.in, satishchandraphq@sify.com, kanwaljit@nic.in, dcp_eastdelhi@yahoo.co.in, dcp_ne@yahoo.com
Date: Saturday, July 5, 2008, 9:56 PM
DATED 1ST APRIL TUESDAY ,PAGE 6
GENERALIZING FROM THE UNIQUE.
IT IS A MATTER OF PRINCIPAL THAT THE SUPREME COURT DRAWS UPON REFERENCES FROM CASES JUDGED BY THEIR LONG RETIRED ESTEEMED COLLEAGUES WHO MADE JUDGMENTS ACCORDING TO
:-
1.THE PREVALENT CONDITIONS AT THAT TIME
2.THE RULING GOVERNMENT
3.THE RULING INDUSTRIALISTS
4.THE INTERNATIONAL AND NATIONAL CRIME SCENARIO.
IT IS A MATTER OF POLICY WHICH WE CANNOT CHANGE.
BUT WE MUST NOT FORGET THAT BE IT ANCIENT TIMES OF DURYODHAN AND YUDHISHTRA OR THE MORE RECENT TIMES OF SANJAY DUTT /HRITIK ROSHAN OR ADVANIJI /SONIA GANDHI -IF WE CATEGORIZE THEM UNDER THE HEADS OF STARS OR POLITICS AND THEN DRAW REFERENCES IT WOULD BE THE WORST MALFEASANCE /MISDEMEANOR .
EACH HUMAN BEING IS UNIQUE , HIS/HER CIRCUMSTANCES UNIQUE AND THE FAMILY WHICH THEY BELONG TO UNIQUE.
HOW CAN WE COMPARE THE INHERITANCE OF A BANKER’S NON -WORKING WIFE TO THE INHERITANCE OF AN INDUSTRIAL EMPIRE WHICH IS FEEDING SO MANY MOUTHS AND FUNDING SO MANY CHARITIES?
IT WOULD BE COMPLETE FAILURE OF THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM AS IN THE CASE OF PRIYAMVADA BIRLA WHO HAD NO RIGHT TO WILL A PROPERTY BELONGING TO THE EMPLOYEES IT WAS FEEDING AND THE CHARITIES IT WAS FUNDING -TO A FOREIGN COMPANY.
LODHA IS A UNITED KINGDOM SPONSORED MERCENARY GROUP WHO WILL TREAT THE EMPLOYEES OF THE COMPANY IN THE SAME WAY AS STERLITE OWNED BALCO HAS TREATED ITS EMPLOYEES IN CHATTISGARH –DEPRIVING THEM EVEN OF THEIR VRS AMOUNTS.
THE ENTIRE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM AND SUPREME COURT WILL LOSE ITS CREDIBILITY AND PEOPLE WILL TAKE LAW IN THEIR OWN HANDS RESULTING IN CHAOS AND RIOTING.
IT WOULD BE SETTING A MOST CRIMINAL PRECEDENT WHEREIN FAMILY MEMBERS OF INDUSTRIAL HOUSES WILL BEQUEATH INDIAN ASSETS TO FOREIGN FIRMS WITHOUT ANY AGREEMENT WITH THEM AS TO THE WELFARE OF THE EMPLOYEES OR ITS PHILANTHROPIC COMMITMENTS.
ACCORDING TO THE 1982 WILL ; M.P. BIRLA CLEARLY SPECIFIED HIS SOLE RESPONSIBILITY AS A BIRLA SON/SCION TO THEIR EMPLOYEES AND PHILANTHROPIC ENDEAVORS.
NOTHING OF THIS SORT WAS SEEN TO IN THE PRIYAMVADA BIRLA WILL AND THE SUPREME COURT SAYS THAT A PERSON CAN BEQUETH AT WILL AND CRIMINAL DESIRE?
MADAME PRIYAMVADA WAS NO ORDINARY HOUSEWIFE WHO WOULD HAVE BEEN ON THE STREETS WITHOUT HER FAMILY’S HELP NOR WAS SHE BEQUEATHING:-
1.AN EARNED PROPERTY.
2.HER MATERNAL/’PATERNAL ANCESTRAL PROPERTY.
3.HER CHILDREN’S PROPERTY.
4.HER RELIGIOUS PROPERTY.
HOW CAN A WOMAN HOLDING THE REINS OF AN INDUSTRIAL EMPIRE WHICH BELONGED TO AN ILLUSTRIOUS FAMILY AND WAS HERS ONLY BY VIRTUE OF BEING SOME’ONE’S WIFE ; GIFT IT TO A FOREIGN CONCERN?
PLEASE REASON AND JOIN IN THE FIGHT FOR JUSTICE IN THIS CASE.
MADAME PRIYAMVADA SERVES AS NO ROLE MODEL FOR ANY CATEGORY OF WOMEN TODAY –EDUCATED /NON EDUCATED;WORKING /HOUSEWIFE; SINGLE MOTHER;OR JUST A LIVE IN.
THE SUPREME COURT HAS DONE GROSS INJUSTICE IN THIS CASE AND THE ISSUE OF ACCOUNTABILITY RAISES ITS UGLY HEAD AS WELL AS JUDGES ASSETS . PLEASE REFER TO.
Friday, March 28, 2008
1997MODUS OPERANDI OF INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZED CRIME -IPC SECTION 503,506 ,507-CRIMINAL INTIMIDATION AND OPEN DEFIANCE OF LAW BY USING HEINOUS SYMBOLS
TOMORROW SONIA GANDHI WILL BEQUEATH INDIA TO THE UNITED KINGDOM AS BAAP KA MAAL ?MAMTA DHODY
1513,OUTRAM LANE
MUKHERJEE NAGAR
DELHI-9
--- On Sun, 5/4/08, mamta kalra
From: mamta kalra
Subject: PLEASE VIEW THE BIRLAS OF MAIHAR CEMENT PLANT ON MY BLOG
To: mhrcem@sancharnet.in, investorrelations@adityabirla.com, pragnyaram@adityabirla.com, shamdas@adityabirla.com
Cc: eduoffkvs@yahoo.co.in, oshi_madan@yahoo.com, vkakvs@yahoo.co.in, piyathakur@hotmail.com, mkmdipr@yahoo.co.in, subramonyvaikom@yahoo.co.in, sbraj2002@yahoo.co.uk, webmaster@iaf.nic.in, mamtadhodykalra@yahoo.com, dirdesidoc@vsnl.net, director@inmas.org, rkashyap100@gmail.com, ys.dadwal@nic.in, delpol@vsnl.com, delpol@del2.vsnl.net.in, womeninfo@delhipolice.com, uautt@nic.in, supremecourt@nic.in, uapau@nic.in, paulkk@nic.in, editor@expressindia.com, wsins@thehindu.co.in, cenyarn@centurytext.com, cendenim@centurytext.com, centextho@centurytext.com, subrata@centurytext.com, opportunities@cottonsbycentury.com, mahendra@centurytext.com, barkha@ndtv.com, sumitbajaj@lgindia.com, lgservice@lgindia.com, amitkathuria@lgindia.com, customerservice@lge.com, dig_garh01@yahoo.co.in, webmaster@france-in-india.org, mail@consulfrance-bombay.org, consul@consulfrance-pondichery.org, info@consulfrance-washington.org, info@faccnyc.org, culture@ambafrance-us.org, subscribe@francemagazine.org, federation@afusa.org, info@ambafrance-us.org, pav@acdlife.va
Date: Sunday, May 4, 2008, 10:36 PM
--- On Sun, 5/4/08, mamta kalra
From: mamta kalra
Subject: PLEASE VIEW THE BIRLAS OF MAIHAR CEMENT PLANT ON MY BLOG
To: mills@digjam.co.in, vxldigjam@sify.com, bvxlcorp@birla-vxl.com, bvora@bvxl.com, ucvxl@birla-vxl.com, export@birla-vxl.com
Date: Sunday, May 4, 2008, 7:59 PM
Thursday, January 17, 2008
Psychological Terrorism
http://cisf.nic.in/eng_ver.htm
http://www.judis.nic.in/supremecourt/qrydisp.aspx?filename=9242
Bandish (1996)Hindi
Joined: 1 day ago
Videos: 1
Film Name - BANDISH Production Year - 1996 Language - Hindi Genre - Action Producer - Prakash Jha Director - Prakash Jha Music Director - Anand Milind Star Cast - Jackie Shroff, Juhi Chawla, Shilpa Shirodkar, Paresh Rawal, Kadar Khan
Director:Prakash Jha
Release Date:23 February 1996 (India)
http://bhatiyajantatalji.blogspot.com
http://bhatiyajantatalji.blogspot.com/2008/05/natures-casino.html
NATURE'S CASINO
http://www.topnews.in/sbi-plans-merge-all-associate-bank
-march-2009-29936
SBI plans to merge all associate bank by March 2009
The country’s largest commercial bank, State Bank of India has announced that the bank plans to merge all the associate banks with itself by March 2009. The move comes at a time when SBI is gearing up for a rights issue which, at an estimated Rs 17,000 crore, is one of the biggest mop ups from the domestic capital markets. The bank is looking to consolidate its position as a global giant with its balance sheet expected to grow manifold. SBI had earlier this month approved merger of State Bank of Saurashtra with itself.
Mr. O P Bhatt, Chairman, SBI said, “Once we get the cabinet nod for merger of State Bank of Hyderabad (SBH), it will set the ball rolling for the merger of the other associate banks. The issue of consolidation of associate banks was taken up only by the boards of SBI and SBH. The boards of other banks have not been sounded about the merger plans.”
SBI has 100% stake in three associate banks — SBH, SBP and SBS —while in others its equity holding ranges from 75% to 98%.
Mr. Bhatt further added, “Once the SBI-SBH merger is through, the consolidation of other entities should not take long as most of the ground work has been done and only the execution is left and It has to happen before March 2009.”
The associate banks are State Bank of Patiala, State Bank of Bikaner and Jaipur, State Bank of Hyderabad, State Bank of Travancore, State Bank of Indore, State Bank of Saurashtra and State Bank of Mysore. The associate banks have together posted a year-on-year growth of 16.85 per cent in net profit at the end of September 2007.
G D Nadaf, General Secretary, All India State Bank Officer's Federation's (AISBOF) said, “The decision of the board to meet on January 25, to consider the merger, is quite unilateral. The federation along with the United Forum of Bank Unions (UFBU) and State Bank of India Staff Federation (AISBISF) will meet on January 3, where we will discuss the merger issue and the future course of the protest."
Sources said, once the proposed mergers are completed, SBI’s asset size will become more than double of ICICI Bank. The private sector banking major ICICI Bank is currently the closest competitor to SBI.
The Bank presently holds market cap worth Rs. 1,26,206 crore, PE Ratio of 22.56. The stock is fairly priced with an EPS of 106.32 and BV of 594.69. The firm had showed a net profit of Rs 1611 crore for the quarter ended September 2007 as against Rs. 1184 crore in same quarter of last year.
At 12:30 PM, the share was trading at Rs 2397 on NSE, up by 3% with previous close of Rs. 2334. It touched an intraday high of Rs 2413 and low of Rs 2351.
Monday, January 7, 2008
INTRODUCTION OF FORENSIC PSYCHOLOGY TO THE LAW AND JUDICIARY OF INDIA BY INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT OF 1872 -CLAUSE 45 "OPINION OF EXPERTS" PIL SC
PIL IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA FOR A REGULATORY BODY FOR BANK FRAUDS AND MOUNTING NPAS IN PUBLIC SECTOR BANKS.
To,
The Chief Justice of
Supreme Court of
Dated
This is a public Interest Litigation on behalf of Public Sector Banks with the threat of Islamic Banking looming large ,which is not only interest free banking ,but will bring with it all terrorist funding to India.Please peruse through article submitted.Please see that the State Bank of India is heaving under massive NPAS and on the other side is the threat of Islamic banking ,both resulting in gross misappropriation of Public funds .The spirit of nationalization of banks was minimum investment in speculation and quote:-
“use of bank credit for speculative and other non productive purposes to be curbed.”
But in the race of industrialization and entry of foreign Banks in
The public interest litigation after perusal through documents submitted is :-
That the Supreme Court of India should appoint a:-
1. “Separate regulatory body for matters of Public Sector Banks ,separate Court for NPAS and other such Banking matters for early and easy disposal of Banking matters, fraud ,cases against officers; ect .; with a mandatory panel of experts from the Banking industry comprising of retired CGMS,and other senior authority from all over India as well as the Head Office at Mumbai, like SBI ,Chairman , Mr.A.K.Purwar , hence forth Mr.O.P.Bhatt in 2011 and so on , for a period of say three years.
2.A panel of EXPERTS from the banking industry assisting the courts in matters related to them will not only facilitate the easy disposal of cases ,but also provide employment and security to the senior management ,when they take decisions against mafia controlled business houses especially in the Builder industry , for access to public funds for crime and terror.
PLEASE REFER TO THE CASE SUBMITTED
GANAPATHY UDYOG ---DEFENDANT/ PETITIONER
VERSUS
PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK—PLANITIFF/RESPONDENT 1996 ISJ(BANKING) 435.
The
Mamta Dhody Kalra
1513,Outram Lane,
Mukherjee Nagar,
Delhi-9
Ring 011-27605550.
AS IT IS AFTER THE BREAK UP OF THE SOVIET UNION IN 1991 AS WELL AS THE WARSAW PACT ,AMERICA PROTECTED ITSELF FROM PSYCHOLOGICAL TERRORISM OF BREAKING HOMES BY FANATICAL ISLAMISTS BY INTRODUCING FORENSIC PSYCHOLOGY IN ITS JUDICIARY.
THERE IS PROVISION FOR THE SAME IN THE INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT OF 1872-CLAUSE 45-"OPINION OF EXPERTS".THIS WAS TOLD TO ME BY JUSTICE ADHIKARI OF JABALPUR HIGH COURT WHO SUPPOSEDLY BLEW HIS BRIANS OUT IN 1987 WITH HIS LICENSED REVOLVER ;IN HIS BATHROOM FOR ALLEGED AFFAIR OF HIS WIFE WITH ANOTHER MAN.
BOTH THE HUSBAND AND WIFE WERE RITUALISTIC HONEST PURE WORKING QUALIFIED LAWYERS & BENGALIS ,WHO HAD A LOVING HOME AND KIDS AND THIS REASON FOR DEATH PURPORTED BY THE JABALPUR POLICE AS WELL AS THE INVESTIGATING AGENCIES WAS THE UNKINDEST CUT OF ALL.
IT WAS ON HIS ADVISE AND MY FATHERS EXTREME DEDICATION TO THE COUNTRY,MY GRANDFATHER BEING IN THE ARMY ACCOUNTS OF ORDNANCE CORPS ,JABALPUR,THAT I DID MY POSTGRADUATION IN PURE PSYCHOLOGY AND SUBMITED AT DELHI UNIVERSITY MY SYNOPSIS TO INTRODUCE FORENSIC PSYCHOLOGY TO THE LAW AND JUDICIARY OF INDIA TO INTRODUCE ACCOUNTABILITY IN MENS REA JUDGEMENTS WHICH SIMPLY TRANSLATED MEANS "GUILTY MIND"
THIS WAS DONE ON 10-10-2005 WHICH HAPPENS TO BE "MENTAL HEALTH DAY AS ALSO THE LATE FILM MAKER GURUDUTT'S DEATH ANNIVERSARY 10-10-1964-FALLING IN THE SAME YEAR AS NEHRUJI'S DEATH 27-5-1964
THE INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, 1872ACT No. 1 OF 1872*[15th March, 1872 .]Preamble.amend the law of Evidence;It is hereby enacted as follows:--PART IRELEVANCY OF FACTS
Afterwards, C is prosecuted for bigamy in marrying B during A's
lifetime. C says that she never was A's wife.
The judgment against B is irrelevant as against C.
(c) A prosecutes B for stealing a cow from him. B is convicted.
A afterwards sues C for the cow, which B had sold to him before
his conviction. As between A and C, the judgment against B is
irrelevant.
(d) A has obtained a decree for the possession of land against B.
C, B's son, murders A in consequence.
The existence of the judgment is relevant, as showing motive for
a crime.
1*[(e) A is charged with theft and with having been previously
convicted of theft. The previous conviction is relevant as a fact in
issue.
(f) A is tried for the murder of B. The fact that B prosecuted A
for libel and that A was convicted and sentenced is relevant under
section 8 as showing the motive for the fact in issue.]
44.
Fraud or collusion in obtaining judgment, or incompetency of Court,
may be proved.
44. Fraud or collusion in obtaining judgment, or incompetency of
Court, may be proved.-Any party to a suit or other proceeding may show
that any judgment, order or decree which is relevant under section
40,41 or 42, and which has been proved by the adverse party, was
delivered by a Court not competent to deliver it, or was obtained by
fraud or collusion.
OPINIONS OF THIRD PERSONS WHEN RELEVANT
45.
Opinions of experts.
45. Opinions of experts.-When the Court has to form an opinion
upon a point of foreign law, or of science, or art, or as to identity
of handwriting 2*[or finger impressions], the opinions upon that point
of persons specially skilled in such foreign law, science or art,
3*[or in questions as to identity of handwriting] 2*[or finger
impressions] are relevant facts.
Such persons are called experts.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Ins. by Act 3 of 1891, s. 5.
2. Ins. by Act 5 of 1899, s. 3. For discussion in Council as to
whether " finger impressions" include "thumb impressions," see
Gazette of
3. Ins. by Act 18 of 1872, s. 4.
24
Illustrations
(a) The questions is, whether the death of A was caused by
poison.
The opinions of experts as to the symptoms produced by the poison
by which A is supposed to have died, are relevant.
(b) The question is, whether A, at the time of doing a certain
act, was, by reason of unsoundness of mind, incapable of knowing the
nature of the act, or that he was doing what was either wrong or
contrary to law.
The opinions of experts upon the question whether the symptoms
exhibited by A commonly show unsoundness of mind, and whether such
unsoundness of mind usually renders persons incapable of knowing the
nature of the acts which they do, or of knowing that what they do is
either wrong or contrary to law, are relevant.
(c) The question is, whether a certain document was written by A.
Another document is produced which is proved or admitted to have been
written by A.
The opinions of experts on the question whether the two documents
were written by the same person or by different persons, are relevant.
Facts bearing upon opinions of experts.
46. Facts bearing upon opinions of experts.-Facts, not otherwise
relevant, are relevant if they support or are inconsistent with the
opinions of experts, when such opinions are relevant.
Illustrations
(a) The question is, whether A was poisoned by a certain poison.
The fact that other persons, who were poisoned by that poison,
exhibited certain symptoms which experts affirm or deny to be the
symptoms of that poison, is relevant.
(b) The question is, whether an obstruction to a harbour is
caused by a certain sea-wall.
The fact that other harbours similarly situated in other
respects, but where there were no such sea-walls, began to be
obstructed at about the same time, is relevant.
47.
Opinion as to handwriting, when relevant.
47. Opinion as to hand-writing, when relevant.-When the Court has
to form an opinion as to the person by whom any document was written
or signed, the opinion of any person acquainted with the handwriting
of the person by whom it is supposed to be written or signed that it
was or was not written or signed by that person, is a relevant fact.
Explanation.--A person is said to be acquainted with the
handwriting of another person when he has seen that person write, or
when he has received documents purporting to be written by that person
in answer to documents written by himself or under his authority and
addressed to that person, or when, in the ordinary course of business,
documents purporting to be written by that person have been habitually
submitted to him.
25
Illustration
The question is, whether a given letter is in the handwriting of
A, a merchant in
B is a merchant in
A and received letters purporting to be written by him. C, is B's
clerk, whose duty it was to examine and file B's correspondence. D is
B's broker, to whom B habitually submitted the letters purporting to
be written by A for the purpose of advising with him thereon.
The opinions of B, C and D on the question whether the letter is
in the handwriting of A are relevant, though neither B, C nor D ever
saw A write.
48.
Opinion as to existence of right or custom, when relevant.
48. Opinion as to existence of right or custom, when relevant.-
When the Court has to form an opinion as to the existence of any
general custom or right, the opinions, as to the existence of such
custom or right, of persons who would be likely to know of its
existence if it existed, are relevant.
Explanation.--The expression "general custom or right" includes
customs or rights common to any considerable class of persons.
Illustration
The right of the villagers of a particular village to use the
water of a particular well is a general right within the meaning of
this section.
49.
Opinion as to usages, tenets, etc., when relevant.
49. Opinion as to usages, tenets, etc., when relevant.-When the
Court has to form an opinion as to--
the usages and tenets of any body of men or family,
the constitution and government of any religious or
charitable foundation, or
or by particular classes of people,
the opinions of persons having special means of knowledge thereon, are
relevant facts.
50.
Opinion on relationship, when relevant.
50. Opinion on relationship, when relevant.-When the Court has to
form an opinion as to the relationship of one person to another, the
opinion, expressed by conduct, as to the existence of such
relationship, of any person who, as a member of the family or
otherwise, has special means of knowledge on the subject, is a
relevant fact:
Provided that such opinion shall not be sufficient to prove a
marriage in proceedings under the Indian Divorce Act (4 of 1869), or
in prosecutions under sections 494, 495, 497 or 498 of the Indian
Penal Code (45 of 1860).
26
Illustrations
(a) The question is, whether A and B, were married.
The fact that they were usually received and treated by their
friends as husband and wife, is relevant.
(b) The question is, whether A was the legitimate son of B. The
fact that A was always treated as such by members of the family, is
relevant.
51.
Grounds of opinion, when relevant.
51. Grounds of opinion, when relevant.-Whenever the opinion of
any living person is relevant, the grounds on which such opinion is
based are also relevant.
Illustration
An expert may give an account of experiments performed by him for
the purpose of forming his opinion.
CHARACTER WHEN RELEVANT
In civil cases character to prove conduct imputed, irrelevant
52. In civil cases character to prove conduct imputed,
irrelevant.-In civil cases the fact that the character of any person
concerned is such as to render probable or improbable any conduct
imputed to him is irrelevant, except in so far as such character
appears from facts otherwise relevant.
53.
In criminal cases previous good character relevant.
53. In criminal cases previous good character relevant.-In
criminal proceedings the fact that the person accused is of a good
character is relevant.
54.
Previous bad character not relevant, except in reply.
1*[54. Previous bad character not relevant, except in reply.-In
criminal proceedings the fact that the accused person has a bad
character is irrelevant, unless evidence has been given that he has a
good character, in which case it becomes relevant.
India's first moped which made Luna a generic brand. Very convenient to ride with negligible maintenance cost it appealed to the hearts of millions of people across the spectrum.
Luna Superstar – “ Gati Mein Hai Pragati”
Luna Superstar is a 60cc, attractively styled moped. It comes in dazzling dual tone metallic colours and has good power and pick up. The easy to ride factor makes it the perfect vehicle for young boys and girls.
I GOT THE CHINA -SILK RED AND GREEN DRESS MADE ESPECIALLY FOR THE OCCASION.
COMPARE MY GIRTH AFTER CHILDBIRTH TO MY MOTHER AND KALRA IN THE PHOTO.BOTH ARE NOT BOTHERED ABOUT THEIR DEEDS OR THEIR DIET AS THEY HAVE A QUEUE OF DOCTOR'S WAITING FOR THEM WITH OTHER PERSON'S ORGANS,SEEING THE NUMBER OF THEIR OWN RELATIVES THAT THEY HAVE HALAL BUTCHERED TO GET THESE EXCLUSIVE CANNIBAL SERVICES.HOWEVER IT TAKES JUST THREE MINUTES TO DIE WITH A BRAIN STROKE.
DELHI GOVERNMENT HAS BANNED LUNA ON ROADS.ITS A UTTER DISGRACE WITH SOARING OIL AND OTHER PRICES-ISLAMIC TERRORISM ON INNOCENT WOMEN WHO WOULD LIKE TO START THEIR LIVES ANEW ON A SMALL BUDGET AND CRIMINAL WASTE OF EDUCATED BRAINS.
JUST BECAUSE ISLAMIC WOMEN ARE UNEDUCATED -ISLAM WILL SLIT THE THROATS OF ALL EDUCATED WOMEN OF OTHER RELIGIONS,WHO DO NOT WANT TO COMPLY WITH ACCEPTANCE OF ISLAM
WITH A GUTTER MAN CONVERTED INTO A WOMAN,NEW PAIR -BOTH HOWEVER FLAUNTING THEIR SEXUAL ORGANS AND FEATS?HOW CAN YOU BE A MAN AND STILL FLAUNT YOUR FEMININTY AND GOL-ROUND BOOBS AS ALSO SEXUAL ESCAPADES ?
http://onlinewatchmovies.blogspot.com/2008/07/aunty-no-1
The Hard Core Eunuchs of Kamatipura Ganesh Visarjan
| Enrollment No | D/406/2005 |
| Applicant Name | LATIKA RANA |
| S/O, D/O, W/O | S/O SH.Y.P.S.RANA |
| Date of Birth | |
| Permanent Address | 97, RAJAN KUNJ, OPP. 6th Bn P.A.C., |
| Telephone No | 0121-2611093 |
| Temporary Address | A-22, SEC-9, OVERSEAS APPTS, ROHINI |
| University | |
http://barcouncilofdelhi.in/bcdmembers.asp?id=D/406/2005
No comments:
Post a Comment